Posts Tagged ‘film’

6
Aug

Lesbian Vampire Killers – review

   Posted by: Taliesin_ttlg    in Taleisin's Vamp Movie Reviews

Hi! Since you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed to get updates.


dvd

Directed by: Phil Claydon

Release date: 2009

Contains spoilers

There shouldn’t be a problem with a film called lesbian Vampire Killers, after all it can spoof the back catalogue of horror films generally and vampire films specifically, with impunity. People going in would know what they were going to get and they would laugh, oh how they would laugh. Thus the problem with the film is… it isn’t, in the main, funny. The problem with the review is, having re-watched the film and then re-read my first impressions, nothing has really changed – I was fairly spot on first time around.

opening scenes look goodThe film begins with scenes from the past that show us how a village was invaded by the demon Carmilla (Silvia Colloca) – the lesbian vampire queen. Incidentally the name, and sexual predilection, is about the only connection you’ll find to the LeFanu novel. The first thing to note is how marvellous it looks. Flowing mists and ethereal chiffon floating behind beautiful women. I cannot, for an instant, complain about the look of the film. The sets were perfect, the vampire imagery divine. Nearly, at least… It was off putting to see a medieval scene and the obvious movement of silicon below the skin at the side of the breast – picky, I know, but it was an imperfection in an otherwise really well done look.

Anyway, a Baron McLaren (Mathew Horne) returns from the crusades and discovers that his wife, Eva (Vera Filatova) has been seduced and turned. He creates a sacred sword and attacks Carmilla. As she dies she curses the village and then he cuts her f*cking head off – as the dialogue puts it.

let that be a warning, clowns are never funnyJimmy (Mathew Horne) is a wimp whose girlfriend, Judy (Lucy Gaskell) dumps him on a regular basis – normally for someone else. Fletch (James Corden) is an individual with anger management issues, who we see being fired from his job as a children’s clown for punching a seven year old. They end up down the pub but Fletch’s idea that they go to Ibiza is a no go – Jimmy lent his savings to Judy.

hikingA dart into a map sets them off on a hiking trip to the village of Cragwich. Fletch is less than impressed with the idea of hiking, has only brought beer and condoms as supplies and smashes Jimmy’s phone when Judy tries to phone Jimmy (she discovered that the man she left Jimmy for was married). Things perk up when he sees a group of hot girls leaving the village pub and getting into a minivan but, when they go in, the pub only has male locals in. Drinks are on the house and, after the local vicar (Paul McGann) has a rant at the landlord, they are told that they can stay at the Mircalla cottage – where the girls have been sent.

Swedish studentsThe girls, Lotte (MyAnna Buring), Trudi (Ashley Mulheron), Anke (Louise Dykan) and Hiedi (Tiffany Mulheron) are in their van, we discover later that they are Swedish students researching the folklore of Carmilla. The van suddenly stops, power gone. It is a phenomena, it seems, that occurs to vehicles when vampires are near – not a first, Cave of the Living Dead featured a similar phenomena. As it is, they fear something outside that turns out to be Jimmy and Fletch – who must be really fast hikers to have caught the van up. They go to the cottage and party for a little bit until the vampires come.

bitten by a lesbian vampireAnke and Hiedi are first to be got – as they have gone to the outside toilet. Though why a house that has a plumbed in shower would fail to have a plumbed in toilet is beyond me? Trudi is pulled through the window of said bathroom with shower. Judy is got as she is driving through the forest – though how she would have even known to go to Cragwich is beyond me and never explained? We have a little bit of house siege, followed by Lotte (the virgin) and Jimmy (the descendant of McLaren) being kidnapped to resurrect Carmilla with their blood, whilst a reluctant Fletch is forced into rescuing them by the vicar, whose daughter, Rebecca (Emer Kenny), turns 18 at midnight and (by the stricture of the curse) will become a lesbian vampire. Incidentally, does this mean that the village men were breeding with any village girls when they were 16 to early 17 (or younger) in order that they might keep the village going through the centuries, and how come there were so (relatively) few vampires?

The biggest problem with the film is that it fails as a comedy. There are a couple of lines that work and that is because they are genre orientated. The vampires are outside but not entering because they haven’t been invited (making the set up of Mircalla’s cottage as a trap the villagers use to feed the vampires and thus save themselves a bit of a nonsense). Jimmy says “It’s not like I’m going to say, ‘Hey, lesbian vampires, some into my cottage,’ is it?” – Which is all the invite they need. The other line is the vicar saying that he is “well versed in knowledge of killing vampires,” to which Fletch replies “Yeah! So’s everyone! Stakes, garlic, beheading, holy water, sunlight. There’s not a f*cker alive who doesn’t know that sh*t!” That’s about all folks, bar the ‘big gay werewolf’ line, which works as a line but is spoilt in the coda.

Mathew Horne as JimmyMost of the jokes are cock gags and they just aren’t funny. The reason is twofold – the writing and the performances. The writing is not strong enough to be funny when coupled with a weak performance, and Horne and Corden are not funny enough to carry it off. They simply do not have the charisma or the natural amusing qualities. Thus, with two unappealing characters – Jimmy is a wimp and gormless, Fletch is a coward, self-serving, misogynistic and violent, both are immature – they cannot make the audience like the characters despite the characters. If, say, Tyler Labine or Nick Frost had played Fletch, the character might have worked despite the weak script.

post fight covered in white gunkWorse still was the idea that the film itself might be misogynistic. Okay it might be for for different reasons – Jimmy is with a domineering woman and then is too gormless to see the signals another woman gives him and Fletch is simply immature, violent and not very nice – but neither can enter a normal relationship with a woman. Even females of the living dead prefer each other over Fletch. That’s okay because the scenario they are in allows them to kill the women, Jimmy is even able to kill his domineering girlfriend and the deaths culminate in an ejaculation – these vampires spew white gunk on death.

18 and penetrated by the sword of d'ildoKilling the main vampire involves a sword – they describe as a cock sword because of the shape of its pommel – which is the sword of D’ildo, God of lust… It takes the idea of the lesbian vampire and suggests that they became a staple of the genre because we hate the idea, rather than the fact that the average straight male horror fan likes to see this. It isn’t a sexploitation because, beyond a distinct lack of nakedness, the sexploitation film – at its core – loved the female form and celebrated it in its own, horny way. Am I reading too much in? On a conscious level maybe, it was probably a hamfisted treatment of the genre more than anything, but the writers need to do some soul searching.

Paul McGann as the vicarI should mention that Paul McGann was rather fun as the swearing, vampire hunting vicar. The difference between his swearing character and Jimmy and Fletch? The actor has an inherent charisma. Incidentally, his daughter is killed, accidentally though she has turned, by Fletch and the magic sword. A moment that could then have been used for some black comedic effect, injecting a pathos that was otherwise missing or just setting up story development was then utterly missed as an opportunity, with only a mumbled attempt to confess and that was all.

the cgi worked wellThe film should have worked, the base concept might have been written on the back of a cigarette pack but it could have been genius in its simplicity. Kudos to the set designers and to Phil Claydon for the look, even the very CGI bits worked because they fit the look and feel. The film lacked a sense of tension as a horror, but it would as it concentrated on trying to be a comedy. As a comedy it failed due to a weak script, a lack of understanding of the genre and very miscast leads. 3 out of 10 is for the look. The imdb page is here.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • BlinkList
  • Digg
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

3
Aug

Sodium Babies – review

   Posted by: Taliesin_ttlg    in Taleisin's Vamp Movie Reviews

posterDirectors: Julien & Benoit Decaillon

Release date: 2009

Contains spoilers

Sometimes you watch a trailer and think wow, and then the film does not live up to that expectation. Other times you watch a trailer and think wow, then the film blows your mind and the trailer simply did not do it justice. Sodium Babies falls into the second camp.

What we have is a graphic novel drawn onto screen in live action, the film has all the sensibilities of the best examples of graphic novels. If you ever played the PC games Max Payne, we are on that sort of trip where the two mediums – in this case film and graphic novel – are sewn together seamlessly. More interestingly, from the point of view of this blog, the film comes up with an altogether new and interesting angle for the genre.

The film begins with scenes of Maurice (Benoit Decaillon) being chased through the countryside by a dog. He caries a shotgun and, as he runs, accidentally discharges it. As though that gives him an idea he turns and faces the dog, firing the second cartridge. Something approaches him as he reloads. Then we fall into the wonderful graphic novel art that peppers the film.

Edouard Audouin as MaxA deal is going down under the watchful eye of Prince (Julien Guibert), who is stood with Foss (Gautier Pras). Though we do not know it at this point they are vampires. Foss comments that, for a ghoul, Max (Edouard Audouin) is fairly bad ass. They are collecting the latest human traffic sent by Rhesus (Hugues Caron). There is a psychic flash and Max turns, distracted, to Prince. A girl runs – we later discover she is called Pussy Cat (Virginia Michaud) – but Max intercepts and carries her back to a cage – he calls her the Belfort Bitch. Two come in – one being Maurice – a can of kerosene is thrown into the air and the second man blows it up with a psychic blast.

For Maurice this is the revenge for a crime dating back thirty years. It is 1973 and Maurice has returned to his squat after a year in the army. He is back with his girl Marie-Jeanne (Camille Berthomier) and she goes for a shower before bed as he smokes another joint. It appears as though he is given a gun – but we do not see by whom. He stalks the house but in his mind he is chased by the dog. The film from the prologue (what he believes is happening) interlaces with the film of him stalking the house, his actions in each mirrors the other but, when he shoots the dog he actually shoots Marie-Jeanne.

A ghoul's educationMaurice ends up in an asylum for the criminally insane, clearly drugged and given electro-shock. He is removed by Max who names him Dead Dog and begins his education or, perhaps, that should say reprogramming. “Nosferatu” he is told “signifying nocturnal predatory, but lets go by the denomination VAMPIRE”. The scenes are wonderfully surreal but we discover that, due to the vampiric reaction to sunlight, they create ghouls.

a fix of bloodGhouls are beings enslaved by their master’s blood (injected like a drug). They are stronger, do not age, are resilient and can go in the sun. They drive prey towards their masters. When asked who is at the top of the food chain Dead Dog replies the ghouls – the response is “I need the right answer, Dead Dog, not the truth.” To me this is one of the most poignant lines in the film, signifying the entire undercurrent of the narrative. The drug simile is rather accurate and after the torturous education Dead Dog is rewarded with his fix

Siegfried shoot before being stakedWe see the decades pass, an endless parade of killing in the name of his vampire master, Prince, and discover that there is an enemy of Prince and he is a vampire named Duc Gael (Samuel Gally). Things reach a peak when a vampire ally of Prince, Siegfried (Pierre Biton), is slain in a club – shot and then staked he explodes in flames. Dead Dog was deliberately distracted by a girl – Pussy Cat. He is ordered to find her but discovers that she sports the exact same tattoo that Marie-Jeanne wore; it is enough to have him rebel…

graphic novel sensibilitiesThe film is marvellous to look at and wonderfully inventive. The programming of Dead Dog and subsequent reprogramming is wonderfully surreal in such a way that it is almost Jean Rollin reminiscent and yet manages to maintain a tightness in focus that perhaps Rollin sometimes lacked. This is perhaps due to the graphic novel-like nature of the film or just because of the excellent structure that the Decallion Brothers maintain throughout.

Samuel Gally as Duc GaelWe get very little in the way of lore other than that which I have already mentioned. The vampires are telepathic but we learn little about them and this is because they are seldom in the film. This is why I said that the film approaches the genre at a new angle. We are not seeing the film from the point of view of the vampire, the hunter or the victim. We are firmly in the world of the servants, the ghouls. Yet we can never shake away the presence of the vampires, looming like shadows behind all that occurs.

Virginia Michaud as Pussy CatWhen I watch a vampire film I am already thinking, during its running time, about the subsequent review. As I watched this I thought to myself that it was certainly looking like an eight out of ten but that score could drop dependant upon what was done with the Dead Dog back story, depending on how it was explained and resolved. The answer was it wasn’t and that was the perfect way for the film to go. We don’t know why he did what he did, not for certain.

wonderful scenery shots appear through the filmYou see, the film has story elements breaking through the ground like bleached bones, fractured and incomplete and yet the incomplete narrative is not a problem, rather it is a deliberate device. Rather than be frustrating it becomes part of the pattern of the film and there is enough clue and exposition to lead one to explore the possibilities of what has happened rather than become frustrated with lack of resolution. We are watching through the eyes of a peon, we will never know the whole truth as he is only told enough to lead him along the path he treads.

Benoit Decaillon as Dead DogThis was a marvellous experience, a film surreal and thoughtful, beautifully drawn around us. Flashes of violence pepper through a film that leaves us exploring all we have seen once the film has ended. Various visual effects and film treatments keep the imagery interesting and lure us deeper into the world that the Decaillon Brothers draw around us. Certainly not for everyone, the film’s arthouse soul may put some off, but to me films should be challenging more often. I mentioned what I felt the score should be as I watched the movie and, as it concluded and then subsequently swam around my mind, it maintained a well deserved 8 out of 10.

At the time of review there is no imdb page but the film has a MySpace page here.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • BlinkList
  • Digg
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

29
Jul

The Strain – book trailers

   Posted by: Taliesin_ttlg    in Taleisin's Vamp Movie Reviews

Now I know I have already reviewed the book The Strain but when Zahir at Undead Whispers found these trailers I knew I had to share.

Now I have to say that to make even a one minute film of a Del Toro book takes a brave director but… wow… give us a movie, now, we demand it!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • BlinkList
  • Digg
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Live
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Page 1 of 1212345...Last »
Easy AdSense by Unreal