Posts Tagged ‘sorority’

5
Jul

The Sisterhood – review

   Posted by: Taliesin_ttlg    in Taleisin's Vamp Movie Reviews

Thank you for coming back! If you haven't yet, you might want to subscribe to our RSS feed to stay up-to-date.


dvdDirector: David DeCoteau

Release date: 2004

Contains spoilers

I guess that it is just about time that I reviewed a DeCoteau film. I have, lurking in my collection, I’ve Been Watching You – which will need reviewing at some point – and Ring of Darkness – needing a ‘Vamp or Not?’ – but for now we concentrate on this.

Now for those who don’t know, DeCoteau is a prolific horror director who is also openly gay and, as a result, does like to put a homoerotic edge into his films. Even in this, where the concentration is on a sorority with a bit of rampant lesbianism, he manages to get buff guys posing in open shirts or lounging around in black shorts. Trouble is, of course, that it is nothing but low level (and very softcore) sexploitation, there is no great furthering of gay cinema in his works for his works are, as far as I have seen, piffle.

bat signThis begins with a guy (with black shorts) and a girl getting it on. Now the nudity in these films is… well it isn’t, there is always underwear in the way. Be that as it may they are having a good time when someone comes in – we only see a leg. The girl apologises and runs and is pursued. She runs from the house – the sorority house of Beta Alpha Tau (BATs), just check out the sign.

neon face huntsWhy were her actions a problem and is our blue neon faced pursuer the main vampire? Who knows, the film reveals nada about this later but, assuming the pursuer is the vampire, it is pretty darn ineffectual. This girl in underwear can out-dodge the chaser willy nilly. Eventually, however, she gets to the building roof and takes a tumble.

Barbara Crampton as Ms MastersCut forward in time and Christine (Jennifer Holland) is attending a new school. She shares a room with Reagen (Kate Plec). Christine is majoring in chemistry but takes a psych class taught by Ms Masters (Barbara Crampton). In there she meets Josh (Storm David Newton). Masters goes on about psychic phenomena and then a floating pen writes Christine on the white board (unseen by the class it seems). Christine freaks and runs. Josh chases after and they talk about inane things and then she bumps into Masters who says her reaction was understandable!

eyes flash purpleWhat we later discover is that this probably is in context of the fact that Christine’s parents died recently. Anyway Masters does some psychic testing and discovers that Christine is very psychic – Hell, her eyes flash purple as she puts candles out by thought alone! Masters tries to recruit her as an agent to infiltrate BATs as they may be evil… as it is Reagen wants to join the sorority and Christine gets drawn in after Josh (who declares that he is saving himself for marriage) stands her up.

have a cross...Masters gives Christine a cross as protection but then singularly fails to tell the girl anything about what she knows… talk about working in the dark. Later, when Christine questions the evil of the sorority and sorority leader Devin (Michelle Borth), Masters says that she should look in the cellar – a suggestion that is then ignored for the rest of the film.

a crash course in lesbian temptation“Where are the vampires?” you might ask and, other than the question mark over neon face at the beginning, it would be a fair question. We seem to get a crash course in lesbian temptation, Devin and her friends can go out in the sun and the cross, whilst annoying to Devin, is soon disposed of. Certainly Devin can cast spells on folks and get what she wants. Little of this is (specifically or at all) vampiric. That will come, for 30 seconds at the end of the film.

a vampire's death... no, reallyIt is all centred on the initiation into the sorority. Devin produces fangs and, after a quick psychic blast by Christine, Masters can stake her. It is somewhat of a damp squib as the whole vampiric appearance weighs in at not a lot of time at all. As for Christine is she good, is she bad – she flip flops in attitude more than a freshly caught fish gasping for air on the deck of a trawler.

fangs... right at the endThere is a vampire coda set in a coffin but that is too little too late. We have sat through MTV style cuts, poor film stock and some of the lamest acting I‘ve seen for quite some time and the money-shot, so to speak, is subsumed by being short, uninteresting and boring. As for lore, not a lot is known. Devin has psychic powers and likes to corrupt. She has been around for 400 years. That’s about it.

It is not a good film, with a mixed up story, poor locations, bad effects (given its relative newness) and really poor acting. One to avoid, methinks. 1 out of 10.

The imdb page is here.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

20
Apr

Vamp or Not? The Telling

   Posted by: Taliesin_ttlg    in Taleisin's Vamp Movie Reviews

posterThis is a 2009 portmanteau film, directed by Nicholas Carpenter and Casey Ward and we need to get this out of the way. Okay, having Playboy Playmates make a film does not add to its credibility, generally, and is unlikely to attract extra audience whilst they remain clothed. That said, why, oh why, oh why, would you cast people clearly in their thirties as sorority girls? Nothing is added and credibility is lost… I’ll shut up now…

As mentioned this is a portmanteau and the wrap around concerns a sorority where, the year before, a girl was refused and so killed herself. The dean of the college became concerned and insisted that they change their recruitment techniques and so the last three candidates have to tell scary stories – of course there is a story of revenge in the portmanteau. There are three stories, the first being a variant of the possessed doll and the last being a variant of the prank call – don’t answer the phone. Neither are particularly original in their variation. This does not bode well for the central story – our ‘Vamp or Not?’ Strangely, therefore, this was actually a marvellous segment, so much so that the characters in film state that the story wasn’t scary, just weird. An insight into the shallowness of the characters as written and good news for us.

Bridget Marquardt as Eva DeMarcoThe story surrounds one Eva DeMarco (Bridget Marquardt) a Hollywood actress who had found that work had dried up because of her age. She was becoming too old to play the love interest (you know, perhaps the filmmakers should have thought about that when casting sorority girls, or perhaps this was a commentary and subtly done!) and told her agent she would play any role – indeed she would take the last role on Earth so long as the cheque clears.

meeting with VictorShe ends up in Europe where she is to be cast in the film “Crimson Echo” being directed by Victor (John D’Aquino). One thing I did like with this segment was how washed out the film looked, it added a subtle atmosphere. Victor lives in a ‘creepy castle’, with a stern assistant who answers the door. When Eva first sees him, he is reflected in a mirror. “At least I know you’re not a vampire,” she quips and he, in best Hungarian accent, blames it on Bela. When she looks confused he explains about Tod Browning and Dracula.

John D’Aquino as VictorEva says about it being before her time and that horror is not her genre – Victor admits that her filmography indicates such. When asked who he considered before her he suggests no one, the role might have been written for her. The diminutive Footcandle (Ed Gale) comes over and checks her light. Victor explains that he has been with them for some time and is obsessed with light and shadow. Of course there are early vampire films that use light and shadow to great effect, Nosferatu and Vampyr being the obvious examples – but am I reading too much in? We shall see.

hallucinatory dreamsVictor gives her a glass of absinth and the drink leads her to hallucinatory dreams, which were strangely psychedelic and of a low level S&M nature – certainly a million miles from the romantic absinth indulgence in the 1992 Dracula. It might have been simply to have some naked breasts in the segment but, to me, it ramped up the surrealistic quota of the segment and, thus, became worthwhile. During the hallucination she sees masked faces. When she awakens there is a card inviting her to a dinner party to mark the film, formal dress required.

the dinner party beginsThe dinner table is filled with people in masks, just like in her hallucination. Victor removes his mask as he speaks to her. He tells her that those round her are the crew for Crimson Echo and, when she asks if they will show their faces, he says in time. He asks if she knows what the first things filmed were, and suggests it was horrors. A projector is started, casting early film of real world horror over his face. We can’t see detail but she clearly can.

revealing their facesThe crew are introduced and remove their masks. Most have textured faces, if I can put it that way, almost zombie like I guess but, of course, Victor, Footcandle and the woman who answered the castle door are not textured in the same way. The crew all made some of the most disturbing films in history, they are undead, kept alive by their own films – an association between the undead and film is explored in Dinner with the Vampire. Now, of course, whilst the term undead is associated with the zombie genre it was first coined by Bram Stoker in Dracula and referred, specifically, to vampires.

Eva being filmedVictor explains that they are undead and make films for the undead. But nowadays Nosferatu just will not do. She was chosen for her virginity in the horror genre, making her perfect. She collapses as they laugh and then she awakens chained and gagged as the cameras roll and one of the dinner party guests approaches with a hacksaw. We next see her at the dinner table where she tells Victor she is ready for her close up, she’ll always be ready. The voice over, by the story teller, informs us that she will never age but she is only alive on film.

I am classing these creatures as vampiresThere were some references to the vampire genre in this and the creatures referred to themselves as undead. We saw no blood drinking or fangs, and there were reflections, but there was also a sentience. There is no definitive evidence that we are dealing with vampires but I tend to like to think so. I am classing these creatures as vampires – if only due to their non-rotted (for some at least) appearances and sentient aspects. This was a worthwhile segment in a, otherwise, distinctly below average production. The imdb page is here.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Page 1 of 11
Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE